Riding the Waves to Eternity: Hangin’ with the Cosmic Surfer

Closing Out 2024

It has been, by choice, a quiet family Christmas. I have spent a lot of it reading. I have a draft of my next book out with readers at present and am letting the shape of the next one form in my mind. Raymond Chandler said that stories distil and right now distilling is where the next book is at.

I think the only thing I watched on TV was the Dr Who Christmas Special which passed the time agreeably so long as you didn’t think about it too hard. There is other stuff I’ll catch up on later on iPlayer, notably Wallace and Gromit. I prefer to watch on a laptop with noise-cancelling headphones because it saves messing around with my hearing aids and TV sound.

My reading has partly been non-fiction relating to the next book but mostly fiction, all of which I’ve enjoyed. I read,

The Mists of Avalon by Marion Zimmer Bradley. This has fallen by the wayside somewhat since her children made allegations against her after her death. That shouldn’t detract from the book which is a remarkable retelling of the Arthurian saga from the perspective of the women involved. It is often described as a feminist retelling but I don’t think it is, or it least not in an ideological sense. What struck me was the depth of her commitment to the underlying mythology and the emotional truth of the character perspectives. I thought it was a little over-plotted towards the end, but I read it with a lot of pleasure. I found out about the allegations after I bought the book in a charity shop and have no expectation of reading anything else by her.

The Player of Games by Iain M Banks. An old favourite of mine both of the Culture novels and of his novels in general. My old paperback copy is getting a bit decrepit now from multiple rereads. Lurking beneath this story is a burning anger and disgust that does not diminish over time.

Against the Day by Thomas Pynchon. This was the only one of Pynchon’s novels I had not read, and it took me a while as I kept putting it down to come back to later (often months would pass.) However, the final 400 pages passed quickly and enjoyably even though I don’t fully understand what was going on. It is a great sprawling thing, exploring lives of the protagonists in real and imagined worlds leading up to WW1. The prose shifts (deliberately I think) from the gloriously sublime to the basest nonsense, keeping the reader wrong-footed. For all its difficulty, I think I’ll revisit it relatively soon, though I may look out for a paperback version since my first edition hardback is something of a brick.

The Lord of the Rings. Tolkien, of course. I hadn’t read this in 30 years and it was interesting to revisit. Rather like the films, it’s better if you fast forward through the Frodo and Sam stuff. It is often held up as the progenitor of modern Fantasy and yet it is not Fantasy at all, at least as we would now understand Fantasy. JRRT’s prose varies between the excellent and the prolix and the tendency towards elevated language in the latter sections (all yay, nay, verily and raiments and odd syntax) quickly gets tiresome. Even so, there’s a lot to like and especially the techniques he uses to ground the story in a long mythological history. Just don’t think about trying The Silmarillion next, it is dull beyond belief.

***

As I wrote this, the news of Jimmy Carter’s death arrived. RIP.

AI Training

Sent to my MP this afternoon.

Dear Christine [Jardine MP]

copy: Chris Bryant MP

It is reported that the UK Government is proposing an opt-out approach to data scraping for the purposes of training AI models and thus it would be up to the individual to alert every AI company/service that they do not want their intellectual property to be used for these purposes. (source: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/dec/17/uk-proposes-letting-tech-firms-use-copyrighted-work-to-train-ai)

As a self-publishing writer living and working in Edinburgh West, an opt-out approach seems to me to be the precise opposite of what is required: an explicit opt-in together with measures to enforce compliance by tech companies is the most ethical option both in general and as a means of protecting my rights as a creator. This is because the proposal,

    • puts the burden of seeking a remedy on the individual being stolen from: it should not be my responsibility to dig through every single company’s website, app or customer support to tell them that I do not want to have my work used to train something that will replace my meagre royalty stream even if I trusted them to honour my wishes (which I do not);
    • does not, as far as I can see, protect me from someone else reposting my work and AI then being trained on the infringing copy;
    • assumes trustworthy behaviour in an asymmetric relationship; nothing that I have seen justifies granting that trust.

Chris Bryant is reported as saying that the proposed opt-in approach is a ‘win-win.’ It plainly is not; there are very obvious winners and losers and, as a creator, I would be amongst the losers.

I appreciate that this is a complex issue in an international environment, but that does not seem to me to be an excuse for letting creators twist in the wind.

Thank you for your consideration.

Regards