Do you know the Ojibwa?
Happy Birthday Thomas Pynchon!
My first encounter with Pynchon was in 1990 when a colleague at work mentioned excitedly that Pynchon was publishing a new novel – his first since 1973′s “Gravity’s Rainbow”. Intrigued I took the plunge and bought Vineland on its day of publication and read it with mounting pleasure but not a little bafflement – a state I came to recognise when reading his other books.
And read them all I have with the exception of Against the Day which I have never been able to finish – mainly because it is so long that any interruption is fatal and I kept getting interrupted.
Cards on the table, my favourite is Mason and Dixon which I read on its release while on holiday in the South of France. Like all of his novels it is smart and funny but it is the one that seems to work best for my tastes, as it charts Mason and Dixon mapping America.
I still have some notes that I kept as I was reading it where I commented that “moral demarcation of the New World parallels the topographical demarcation – as much about beginnings as nascent endings; decadence of the Old Empires transported to the moral vacuum of the New?” I also pondered whether it functioned as an American ‘Midnight’s Children’ or ‘Tin Drum’ – the moral birth of a nation.
Also, references to Dr. Who and Star Trek
===
I read an article in The Guardian today in which one Benji Lanyado, for a single day, uncritically accepted every piece of unsolicited advice and recommendation served up to him by assorted algorithms on social networking and other sites. It is an entertaining piece which takes as its origin an (initially) unexamined premise that “Google has become so good at meeting our desires that we spend less time discovering new ones”. That line is taken from this article by Ian Leslie.
Maybe I am an outlier or some other species of grumpy old curmudgeon but I have to say that my experience online is different. This might be because I am adblocked to the hilt and routinely decline to accept cookies, but also I noted long ago that most of the ‘suggestions’ I received were a long way wide of the mark.
For example the much vaunted capabilities of Amazon miss their target with me almost all of the time (Hey! you bought a Robert Wyatt cd, we recommend that you buy all of the works of Soft Machine, Caravan and why not Jethro Tull and Gentle Giant too?). The algorithm is essentially very simplistic – buy or view one thing and the algorithm seems to assume that you absolutely must be interested in everything that Amazon considers to be similar.
Mostly this is no more relevant to what I might actually want than the ads on Spotify which bear no resemblance whatsoever to what I am listening to or have saved. This is simultaneously irritating and refreshing.
I have been around the internet for a long time – long enough to remember when Mosaic and Gopher were nerdy delights for the guys in the University computer suite. Memories fade but it does mean that I have been online for 20+ years.
Times have changed – I remember being mildly rebuked at work for sending an eMail to an IT contractor rather than a formal letter or a fax. The matter only came up because the contractor didn’t check his eMail very often. This was in the mid 1990s.
I find that I still retain attitudes which I formed then in relation to advertising and spam and also what we used to call ‘netiquette’. I think I also retain some of the idealism of those days too. But also, and possibly crucially, when I first went online I was roundabout 30 and my ability to follow my nose through the fields of serendipity in search of culture and stimulation was already formed in a world in which ‘online’ and ‘offline’ were terms which had not been invented.
Where I am going with this is to react against the notion that ubiquitous interconnectedness transforms us all into a TRON-like state in which we are sucked into the programme to become entirely disconnected from what we used to call meat-space. As it happens I don’t think we have as a species even begun to explore the possibilities of always-on interactivity and I don’t want to go down a path which reduces the internet and all its works to ‘mere’ tools.
What the likes of Facebook and Twitter do give me, just like conversations in the pub, are the recommendations and enthusiasms of friends and acquaintances, which have been one of the more consistent routes by which I have been turned onto new artists or authors, particularly as I try to maintain a large-ish circle of contacts with many and varied interests.
In fact I go out of my way not to become reliant on the social media teat for discovering new “desires”.
Looked at in another way, social media, Google and interconnectedness only give me a limited portion of “what I want” because what I want is, in the end, not reducable to information flows or the purchasing of commodities. What I want is a better understanding of myself and the universe in which I exist and that is not, in the end, an exercise in discovering facts; it is the search for a fulfilling experience of self-awareness.












Recent Comments